<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camacho 1962 Torpedo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattscigar.com/2008/07/18/camacho-1962-torpedo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattscigar.com/2008/07/18/camacho-1962-torpedo/</link>
	<description>The Best Cigar is Your Favorite Cigar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Werner</title>
		<link>http://mattscigar.com/2008/07/18/camacho-1962-torpedo/#comment-16287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Werner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 08:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsbymatt.wordpress.com/?p=204#comment-16287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This cigar presents itself, with dual wrappers and the title bearing a significant year in Camacho history, as some kind of signature stick.  Well, it ain&#039;t bad, but it is fairly bland in spite of being smooth.  It tends to burn fast, thus providing copious smoke, yet for this reason it remains pretty lackluster.

All in all, a decent stick yet not particularly distinguished ad it it is all dry leather and wood with little variation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cigar presents itself, with dual wrappers and the title bearing a significant year in Camacho history, as some kind of signature stick.  Well, it ain&#8217;t bad, but it is fairly bland in spite of being smooth.  It tends to burn fast, thus providing copious smoke, yet for this reason it remains pretty lackluster.</p>
<p>All in all, a decent stick yet not particularly distinguished ad it it is all dry leather and wood with little variation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Newman</title>
		<link>http://mattscigar.com/2008/07/18/camacho-1962-torpedo/#comment-14039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Newman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsbymatt.wordpress.com/?p=204#comment-14039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt, at your convenience can you please e-mail me as I have been unable to find a way to contact you directly through your site.  Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, at your convenience can you please e-mail me as I have been unable to find a way to contact you directly through your site.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Her Humidor</title>
		<link>http://mattscigar.com/2008/07/18/camacho-1962-torpedo/#comment-14038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Her Humidor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsbymatt.wordpress.com/?p=204#comment-14038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a few of the coronas that seem pretty lackluster as well. I think your review is pretty accurate about this brand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a few of the coronas that seem pretty lackluster as well. I think your review is pretty accurate about this brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Reviews of the Week #32 (July 19 2008) @ Cigar Inspector</title>
		<link>http://mattscigar.com/2008/07/18/camacho-1962-torpedo/#comment-14037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cigar Reviews of the Week #32 (July 19 2008) @ Cigar Inspector]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsbymatt.wordpress.com/?p=204#comment-14037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] but not impressive medium-bodied smoke. Read the full review here&#8230;   (No Ratings Yet) &#160;Loading [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but not impressive medium-bodied smoke. Read the full review here&#8230;   (No Ratings Yet) &nbsp;Loading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

